Download the Tom's Hardware App aus dem AppStore
Die Referenz für aktuelle News aus dem Technologiebereich
Ja Nein
Suche Tom's Hardware
Anmelden mit

Doom 3

Timedemo1 (1024x768x32, 4x AA, 8x AF, Ultra Quality)

Sie sind hier : Cartes graphiques > SLI und Crossfire: Dual Grafikkarten Charts 2008 (1. Quartal) > Doom 3


Wählen Sie den Benchmark
  1. 3DMark06 (v1.0.2) HDR/SM3.0 Score 1024x768x32, no AA, Trilinear Filtering, Default Q
  2. 3DMark06 (v1.0.2) HDR/SM3.0 Score 1024x768x32, 4x AA, 8x AF, Default Quality
  3. 3DMark06 (v1.0.2) HDR/SM3.0 Score 1280x1024x32, 4x AA, 8x AF, Default Quality
  4. 3DMark06 (v1.0.2) HDR/SM3.0 Score 1600x1200x32, 4x AA, 8x AF, Default Quality
  5. 3DMark06 (v1.0.2) HDR/SM3.0 Score 1920x1200x32, 4x AA, 8x AF, Default Quality
  6. 3DMark06 (v1.0.2) SM2.0 Score 1024x768x32, no AA, Trilinear Filtering, Default Q
  7. 3DMark06 (v1.0.2) SM2.0 Score 1024x768x32, 4x AA, 8x AF, Default Quality
  8. 3DMark06 (v1.0.2) SM2.0 Score 1280x1024x32, 4x AA, 8x AF, Default Quality
  9. 3DMark06 (v1.0.2) SM2.0 Score 1600x1200x32, 4x AA, 8x AF, Default Quality
  10. 3DMark06 (v1.0.2) SM2.0 Score 1920x1200x32, 4x AA, 8x AF, Default Quality
  11. Battlefield 2142 1024x768x32, no AA, Trilinear Filtering, max Quali
  12. Battlefield 2142 1024x768x32, 4x AA, 8x AF, max Quality
  13. Battlefield 2142 1280x1024x32, 4x AA, 8x AF, max Quality
  14. Battlefield 2142 1600x1200x32, 4x AA, 8x AF, max Quality
  15. Battlefield 2142 1920x1200x32, 4x AA, 8x AF, max Quality
  16. Dark Messiah of Might and Magic 1600x1200x32, 4x AA, 8x AF, max Quality, HDR-R
  17. Dark Messiah of Might and Magic 1920x1200x32, 4x AA, 8x AF, max Quality, HDR-R
  18. Dark Messiah of Might and Magic 1024x768x32, no AA, Trilinear Filtering, max Quali
  19. Dark Messiah of Might and Magic 1024x768x32, 4x AA, 8x AF, max Quality, HDR-R
  20. Dark Messiah of Might and Magic 1280x1024x32, 4x AA, 8x AF, max Quality, HDR-R
  21. Doom 3 1024x768x32, no AA, Trilinear Filtering, Ultra Qua
  22. Doom 3 1280x1024x32, 4x AA, 8x AF, Ultra Quality
  23. Doom 3 1600x1200x32, 4x AA, 8x AF, Ultra Quality
  24. Microsoft Flight Simulator X 1024x768x32, no AA, Trilinear Filtering, Ultra Qua
  25. Microsoft Flight Simulator X 1024x768x32, in Game AA, in Game AF, Ultra Quality
  26. Microsoft Flight Simulator X 1280x1024x32, in Game AA, in Game AF, Ultra Qualit
  27. Microsoft Flight Simulator X 1600x1200x32, in Game AA, in Game AF, Ultra Qualit
  28. Microsoft Flight Simulator X 1920x1200x32, in Game AA, in Game AF, Ultra Qualit
  29. Oblivion: The Elder Scrolls 4 (Outdoor) 1024x768x32, no AA, Trilinear Filtering, max Quali
  30. Oblivion: The Elder Scrolls 4 (Outdoor) 1024x768x32, no AA, 8x AF, max Quality, HDR-R
  31. Oblivion: The Elder Scrolls 4 (Outdoor) 1280x1024x32, no AA, 8x AF, max Quality, HDR-R
  32. Oblivion: The Elder Scrolls 4 (Outdoor) 1600x1200x32, no AA, 8x AF, max Quality, HDR-R
  33. Oblivion: The Elder Scrolls 4 (Outdoor) 1920x1200x32, no AA, 8x AF, max Quality, HDR-R
  34. Overall all Games fps
  35. Prey 1024x768x32, no AA, Trilinear Filtering, max Quali
  36. Prey 1024x768x32, 4x AA, 8x AF, max Quality
  37. Prey 1280x1024x32, 4x AA, 8x AF, max Quality
  38. Prey 1600x1200x32, 4x AA, 8x AF, max Quality
  39. Warhammer Mark of Chaos (v1.6) 1600x1200x32, 4x AA, 8x AF, max Quality
  40. Warhammer Mark of Chaos (v1.6) 1920x1200x32, 4x AA, 8x AF, max Quality
  41. Warhammer Mark of Chaos (v1.6) 1024x768x32, no AA, Trilinear Filtering, max Quali
  42. Warhammer Mark of Chaos (v1.6) 1024x768x32, 4x AA, 8x AF, max Quality
  43. Warhammer Mark of Chaos (v1.6) 1280x1024x32, 4x AA, 8x AF, max Quality

Performance-Messungen mit selbstfertigtem Demo. Spiel ist für DirectX 8 konzipiert und basiert auf der Series Engine 2

Suchen mit :
0 30,7 61,4 92,1 122,8 153,5
Frame Rate (in fps)

    • G80,576 MHz,1800 MHz,768 MB GDDR3,4.0,yes
    Testplattform
    183.80

    • G80,500 MHz,1600 MHz,640 MB GDDR3,4.0,yes
    Testplattform
    180.50

    • G80,575 MHz,1700 MHz,320 MB GDDR3,4.0,yes
    Testplattform
    180.10

    • G71,650 MHz,1600 MHz,512 MB GDDR3,3.0/3.0,yes
    Testplattform
    179.10

    • G80,500 MHz,1600 MHz,320 MB GDDR3,4.0,yes
    Testplattform
    179.10

    • R580+,648 MHz,1998 MHz,512 MB GDDR4,3.0/3.0,yes
    Testplattform
    178.50

    • G70,550 MHz,1700 MHz,512 MB GDDR3,3.0/3.0,yes
    Testplattform
    176.70

    • G92,660 MHz,1900 MHz,512 MB GDDR3,4.0,yes
    Testplattform
    175.30

    • R580,621 MHz,1440 MHz,512 MB GDDR3,3.0/3.0,yes
    Testplattform
    173.70

    • G71,550 MHz,1400 MHz,512 MB GDDR3,3.0/3.0,yes
    Testplattform
    172.80

    • 4xG71,500 MHz,1200 MHz,4x512 MB GDDR3,3.0/3.0,yes
    Testplattform
    171.10

    • R580,621 MHz,1440 MHz,256 MB GDDR3,3.0/3.0,yes
    Testplattform
    167

    • G71,520 MHz,1440 MHz,256 MB GDDR3,3.0/3.0,yes
    Testplattform
    166.60

    • R580+,621 MHz,1800 MHz,256 MB GDDR3,3.0/3.0,yes
    Testplattform
    158

    • G70,430 MHz,1200 MHz,256 MB GDDR3,3.0/3.0,yes
    Testplattform
    154.10

    • R600,743 MHz,1656 MHz,512 MB GDDR3,4.0,yes
    Testplattform
    146.80

    • G84,675 MHz,2016 MHz,256 MB GDDR3,4.0,yes
    Testplattform
    145

    • G70,400 MHz,1000 MHz,256 MB GDDR3,3.0/3.0,yes
    Testplattform
    143.80

    • R600,743 MHz,1656 MHz,512 MB GDDR3,4.0,yes
    Testplattform
    136.50

    • G73,560 MHz,1400 MHz,256 MB GDDR3,3.0/3.0,yes
    Testplattform
    120.40

    • NV45,425 MHz,1100 MHz,256 MB GDDR3,3.0/3.0,yes
    Testplattform
    118.20

    • RV560,574 MHz,1344 MHz,256 MB GDDR3,3.0/3.0,yes
    Testplattform
    111

    • RV630,800 MHz,1400 MHz,512 MB GDDR3,4.0,yes
    Testplattform
    107.70

    • NV45,350 MHz,1000 MHz,256 MB GDDR3,3.0/3.0,yes
    Testplattform
    92.40

    • RV630,600 MHz,1400 MHz,256 MB DDR3,4.0,yes
    Testplattform
    92.30

    • RV535,621 MHz,1386 MHz,256 MB GDDR3,3.0/3.0,yes
    Testplattform
    83.40

    • RV530,587 MHz,1386 MHz,256 MB GDDR3,3.0/3.0,yes
    Testplattform
    83.30

    • RV530,581 MHz,1368 MHz,256 MB GDDR3,3.0/3.0,yes
    Testplattform
    82.90

    • G73,400 MHz,800 MHz,256 MB GDDR2,3.0/3.0,yes
    Testplattform
    74.50

    • G84,540 MHz,1400 MHz,256 MB GDDR3,4.0,yes
    Testplattform
    68.70

    • NV43,500 MHz,1000 MHz,128 MB GDDR3,3.0/3.0,yes
    Testplattform
    63

    • RV530,500 MHz,792 MHz,256 MB GDDR2,3.0/3.0,yes
    Testplattform
    55.50

    • G86,459 MHz,800 MHz,512 MB DRR2,4.0,yes
    Testplattform
    37.60
  •  
0 30,7 61,4 92,1 122,8 153,5
Frame Rate (in fps)
Legende
  •   Nvidia
  •   ATI
Dieses Chart auf meine Website
Anderen Cartes graphiques Performance Charts
Beste Angebote
Neueste Testberichte
[Kurztest] EVGA GTX 650 Ti Boost SC - Was bringt der Extra-Kick wirklich?

[Kurztest] EVGA GTX 650 Ti Boost SC - Was bringt der Extra-Kick wirklich?
EVGA übertaktet die GTX 650 Ti Boost recht ordentlich und verspricht zudem auch mehr Beschleunigung durch den höheren Boost-Takt. Wie und ob es überhaupt gelingt, die höheren Taktraten auch unter realen Belastungen zu halten, soll dieser Test klären. mehr lesen

Alle Grafikkarten Tests
Neueste News
Alle Grafikkarten News
Was andere suchten